Loading... Please wait...

Legg enquiry on MPs' expenses (19 October 2009)

Tom Levitt has agreed to repay to the House of Commons £389 as requested by Sir Thomas Legg. This is in respect of a sofa bed purchased in 2004 which Sir Thomas has deemed ‘extravagant’ even though the Fees Office approved it at the time. He said “Had I been asked to pay this balance at the time I would readily have agreed to do so.

  My flat in Lambeth    Flat in Lambeth, view from the front Flat in Lambeth, view from the back
View from the front View from the back

Tom Levitt's Expenses

Transcript of High Peak Radio interview

Tom was interviewed about his expenses for 30 minutes
on High Peak Radio on 29 May.
Here is a transcript of the interview with Ben Price

Tom's expenses Q&A

Tom has now had 3 meetings in the constituency about his expenses:
this is a list of the frequently asked questions and answers.

Publication of Expenses

In response to public demand I am publishing the details of all my expenditure as an MP since 2004, which is the date to which Fees Office records go back. The files marked Office Costs(Incidental Expenses Provision) relate to my office costs. ACA (Additional Costs Allowance) is better known as the seond home allowance. in 2007 a new budget heading, the Communications Allowance, was introduced to pay for newsletters acording to strict rules.

Please note that some pages have been deleted by the Fees Office. These include compliments slips signed by my staff, blank letterheads and pages with no salient information. No financial information has been excluded in this way. Similarly the black 'redaction' boxes are also put in by the Fees Office. They hide information which is of a personal nature, opinion/comment or security sensitive such as telephone numbers or bank account information. This 'redaction' is allowed under Freedom of Information rules.

Hold your cursor over the icon to see the file name:

ACA 2004-05

ACA 2005-06

ACA 2006-07

ACA 2007-08

Office Costs 2004-05

Office Costs 2005-06

Office Costs 2006-07

Office Costs 2007-08

In some cases you will see ACA claim forms duplicated. This is because the Fees Office has authorised initial payment on the original claim and a subsequent part payment on the copy. Some of the ACA claims relate to two months rather than one and thus appear high.

Further to the article in the Sunday Telegraph on 24 May, the wreath should never have been claimed, it was an error, it was not paid; and over 20 other wreaths have never been claimed or paid. The claim for work on my flat was never intended to be 'over the limit' but the bills did total above the limit. I did not expect to get the full amount back and I did not do so. And in no financial year as a whole was my mortgage interest claim overpaid; any adjustments were made during the course of the year to ensure this.

Questions have also been raised about MPs' Council Tax bills for our second homes. As soon as it was pointed out to me that I had claimed for 12 months Council Tax payments in 2006-07 and 2007-08, instead of ten, I paid themoney back to the Fees Office. This was £200 and £212 respectively. This error did not happen before 2006 and did not happen in 2008-09. As of late June 2009, I have made no second homes claims for the financial year 2009-10 at all so far. This is to give me time to check all my figures.

The following summary of my expenses is taken from www.theyworkforyou.com Please note: the 'Other Costs' figure relates to cover for a part time member of staff absent on maternity leave. The rank order figures give a different story from those in the Sunday Times where I was listed as 8th overall over the last four years. Figures in brackets are ranks. More detail of what each is supposed to cover can be found on the Parliament web site.

Type

2007/08 (ranking out of 645)

2006/07 (ranking out of 645)

2005/06

2004/05 (ranking out of 659)

2003/04 (ranking out of 658)

2002/03 (ranking out of 657)

2001/02 (ranking out of 657)

Additional Costs Allowance

£22,450 (270th)

£20,310 (379th)

£16,977

£20,780 (joint 243rd)

£17,472 (396th)

£19,722 (joint 1st)

£15,738 (joint 236th)

London Supplement

£0

£0

£0

£0

£0

£0

£0

Incidental Expenses Provision

£15,304 (459th)

£23,403 (142nd)

£21,650

£19,325 (joint 11th)

£18,799 (joint 13th)

£18,227 (joint 216th)

£18,691 (211th)

Staffing Allowance

£86,154 (376th)

£80,085 (441st)

£74,262

£70,236 (joint 359th)

£61,981 (565th)

£54,747 (589th)

£39,957 (515th)

Communications Allowance

£17,315 (10th)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Members' Travel

£10,990 (186th)*

£11,842 (140th)**

£9,031

£11,185 (298th)

£11,928 (247th)

£9,350 (357th)

£8,957 (276th)

Members' Staff Travel

£342 (260th)

£475 (225th)

£516

£1,115 (165th)

£364 (305th)

£647 (joint 223rd)

£684 (197th)

Members' Spouse Travel

£2,955 (33rd)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Members' Family Travel

£0

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Centrally Purchased Stationery

£2,025 (23rd)

£7,915 (6th)

£4,147

£3,155 (48th)

£2,864 (28th)

£2,567 (39th)

£1,508 (168th)

Stationery: Associated Postage Costs

£4,594 (93rd)

£23,700 (4th)

£12,044

£9,724 (51st)

£8,737 (33rd)

N/A

N/A

Centrally Provided Computer Equipment

£930 (604th)

£930 (joint 523rd)

£930

£1,959 (177th)

£1,959 (172nd)

£1,959 (170th)

£1,959 (162nd)

Other Costs

£1,561 (68th)

£0

£0

£0

£0

£0

£0

Total

£164,620 (48th)

£168,660 (8th)

£139,557

£137,479 (85th)

£124,104 (221st)

£107,219 (458th)

£87,494 (354th)

* Regular journeys between home/constituency/Westminster: Mileage £3,556 (251st). Rail £7,351 (99th). Misc £6 (256th). Other: Rail £77 (131st).

** Car £2,678 (348th). Rail £7,725 (74th). Air £588 (142nd). European £851 (48th).

Want to comment?
Sort comments by: latest conversation | latest top level comment


Lewis Donaldson
Message left at 12:52 pm, Sat 4th Jul 2009
Tom, are you going to be holding a car boot sale any time soon? we are short on bedding in our house and it seems you have plenty!!!
Options: reply to this message | report this message as offensive
Richard Stoodey
Message left at 10:32 pm, Sun 21st Jun 2009
Mr Levitt. You are the lowest form of the low !! My mother lost her two brothers My father was one of the first to land - on June 5th 1944 to take Pegasus Bridge You ......... try and show you care !!!! then claim back for the Wreath !!!! You disgust me you should be SACKED I bet you would claim for the church collection if you could get a reciept !!!!! And on top of that you are ripping off the tax payer with a new bathroom !! .... If it was like for like ... why didnt you keep the old one ? I BET YOU HAVNT THE GUTS TO POST THIS ?????
Options: reply to this message | report this message as offensive
Tom levitt
Message left at 06:03 pm, Mon 6th Jul 2009
I did not claim for the wreath and I did not receive any money for it. Even the Daily Telegraph now accepts this (on its summary of MPs' expenses). Kindly read my web site.
Options: reply to this message | report this message as offensive
RichardH
Message left at 10:11 pm, Wed 10th Jun 2009
You keep going on about meetings in the Constituency, but you don't announce them on your site nor do you publish them in the press, and the invites you send out give 2 days notice. When are you going to call a meeting well in advance to allow lots of people to attend? Are you afraid?
Options: reply to this message | report this message as offensive
Tom Levitt
Message left at 11:41 am, Tue 16th Jun 2009
Everyone who contacted me about this issue was invited to a meeting at least once. Several hundred others on my email news list (not all supporters by any means) were also invited. About 80 attended in total. No one actually asked me to set up a meeting and very few MPs have held them.
Options: reply to this message | report this message as offensive
RichardH
Message left at 04:17 pm, Tue 16th Jun 2009
Not good enough! If someone called a meeting, would you turn up?
Options: reply to this message | report this message as offensive
Jack Hardman
Message left at 12:57 pm, Tue 9th Jun 2009
Tom, While I've not gone through all the pdf files (has anybody??), why has the address of your constituency office been blacked out? I cannot see the sense in this; and only sows seeds of doubt and confusion with other bills (like Severn Trent) which have also had the address redacted. Surely, it would be better to clearly show your office address on bills relating to that address, to avoid all possible doubt. Oh, and thanks for all the laughs you've given us via the Buxton Advertiser letters page over the hair dryer!
Options: reply to this message | report this message as offensive
Tom Levitt
Message left at 11:43 am, Tue 16th Jun 2009
I enjoyed the jokes on the letters page too. I did not do any of the redactions, that was the Fees Office in line with FoI guidelines. My Constituency office address is on this web site. Plenty of people apparently have trawled through the files!
Options: reply to this message | report this message as offensive
Jack Hardman
Message left at 09:43 am, Thu 18th Jun 2009
Thanks for replying. I've just read that only RESIDENTIAL addresses have been redacted. However, as per my previous comment, you have claimed for a Severn Trent Water bill, which I assumed was for your constituency office. The trouble is that now, using the statement that residential addresses are redacted, it appears more likely that that particular bill must have been for your constituency home. If however, an over-enthusiastic blacker-out at the fees office has also been redacting office addresses for perfectly proper expense claims, he is doing you and other MPs no favours whatsoever. Is there any chance you could raise this as an issue?
Options: reply to this message | report this message as offensive
Tom Levitt
Message left at 04:43 pm, Mon 22nd Jun 2009
I have never claimed for a water bill for my constituency home; this can only be for the office. I asked for no redactions (other than those which the Fees Office deemed necessary for data protection/privacy reasons consistent with FoI). If you email me which bill you are looking at I will look into it.
Options: reply to this message | report this message as offensive
Rapid Rich
Message left at 10:48 pm, Mon 8th Jun 2009
Can I ask a question ? ......... What has a hair dryer got to do with government business ? Mind you .... if you have to repay it at least you can advertise it as un-used on ebay !!
Options: reply to this message | report this message as offensive
Steve
Message left at 03:24 pm, Fri 5th Jun 2009
Why are the tax payers paying £3k for spouse's travel? What does she/he do for us? I assume the computer equipment was an amount you could claim, so you did - to the max. I do not buy new computer equipment annually, I don't have to. Over the period shown I would have expected to see it claimed twice only.
Options: reply to this message | report this message as offensive
Tom Levitt
Message left at 11:52 am, Tue 16th Jun 2009
On computers, it is 4 years since I bought a PC. The annually recurring figures are leasing costs.
Options: reply to this message | report this message as offensive
Tom Levitt
Message left at 11:49 am, Tue 16th Jun 2009
My wife runs my London office and my web site on a part time basis. When she comes to High Peak I can claim her transport either as spouse or staff, the rules are the same for each. There is a limit to the number of journeys that can be claimed under these headings.
Options: reply to this message | report this message as offensive
Rapid Rich
Message left at 10:50 pm, Mon 8th Jun 2009
Can I offset my wife's travel to visit me when I am working away ? and claim it against my tax even .... nevermind claim back the FULL AMOUNT !
Options: reply to this message | report this message as offensive
Martin Ford
Message left at 01:57 pm, Thu 4th Jun 2009
Why are the public being "encouraged" to use public transport ( where it exists) when M.P.'s are claiming so much car mileage expenses.
Options: reply to this message | report this message as offensive
Tom Levitt
Message left at 11:56 am, Tue 16th Jun 2009
Most of my travel cost is train travel and the West Coast main line is more expensive than others. High Peak is a large constituency and it is not feasible for me to rely on public transport. People expect me to be actively involved in constituency life and I try to respond positively to as many invitations as possible. Essential car mileage is paid at HMRC rate of 40p.
Options: reply to this message | report this message as offensive
martin ford
Message left at 01:38 pm, Thu 4th Jun 2009
when I work away, as I frequently do, I cannot claim for things like a trouser press like one M.P. but I too need to look smart. Why is the cost of food allowed ? We all have to eat, at home or away, and I don't claim for this when it is an expense I would otherwise incur personally at home. Some time ago, I asked why the government do not simply buy accomodation in London. Use it when an M.P. and then pass it to the next when the term in office ends. Instead, why can any profits in the property value go back to the M.P. on a sale, when the purchase has been Tax Payer assisted. Also ,what happens to all the contents WE purchase, are they bought back and the state refunded ?
Options: reply to this message | report this message as offensive
Tom Levitt
Message left at 11:58 am, Tue 16th Jun 2009
(See also Sue Mayer's point below). These are all issues which the independent Committee on Standards in Public Life is now looking at and upon whihc it will report, hopefully later this year.
Options: reply to this message | report this message as offensive
Sue Mayer
Message left at 01:43 pm, Wed 3rd Jun 2009
What happens to all the things you buy on expenses (eg clock radio, towels, iron, table) once you are no longer a MP. Do they become the property of the state, do you buy them back from us, or do you just keep them. I also wondered whether the food you claim for is for eating out on business or just what you eat in your flat in London? There are no receipt to give clues on this.
Options: reply to this message | report this message as offensive
Allan Robinson
Message left at 12:26 am, Fri 16th Oct 2009
Mr Levitt,do you think that £825 on solid oak skirting boards is essential to your duties as an MP?Also I hope you are happy with your £1336 spent on solid oak flooring.Seems funny that you should claim for two hoovers in a little over two years-I find a brush is more effective for wooden floors.I bet you dont reply to this.Kind regards
Options: reply to this message | report this message as offensive
Tom Levitt
Message left at 03:22 pm, Tue 20th Oct 2009
Sir Thomas Legg has looked independently into all of these issues. He has asked me to repay £389 towards the cost of a sofa bed in 2004, but accepted all the rest of my furniture and fittings claims as legitimate.
Options: reply to this message | report this message as offensive
Promoted by Ray Collins, General Secretary, the Labour Party, on behalf of the Labour Party, both at 39 Victoria Street, London, SW1H 0HA.
Powered by taobase from Tangent Labs. Hosted by Rackspace, 2 Longwalk Road, Stockley Park, Uxbridge, UB11 1BA.